Page 45 - Overview_final

This is a SEO version of Overview_final. Click here to view full version

« Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page »

Defining technical priorities and an implementation strategy for bioenergy development should be based on the considerations and outcomes of the full context analysis and assessment of bioenergy base-lines, resource assessment, risks and opportunities.

These next steps serve as the practical implementation of all of the considerations that were realized in the previous steps. At this stage the context for a bioenergy strategy should be understood, risks assessed, mitigation identified, and stakeholders engaged.

Based upon the risk assessment of the different technol-ogy options and settings, it would be up to the Task Force, in consultation with the Stakeholder Forum, to select priorities that the countries should pursue to exploit its specific potential for sustainable modern bioenergy systems. Priorities that are to be pursued with public financial support should be ranked for inclusion in an implementation strategy. Ranking of priorities can be done against different criteria, which must be clearly stated. Criteria could include:

Technical merit, including technological soundness and accessibility of technology

Financial and economic merit, including cost effective-ness, cost-benefit ratios and coherence with local and national development priorities

Ecological soundness, including climate proofing Fit with ongoing programmes and institutional capacities, and

Page 45 - Overview_final

This is a SEO version of Overview_final. Click here to view full version

« Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page »